| 04:12:23 | CIA-6: | aboudreault * r9606 /trunk/mapserver/mapstring.c: Correct a possible misuse of msStringSplitComplex function |
| 04:30:43 | CIA-6: | aboudreault * r9607 /trunk/mapserver/mapserver.h: proper function definition for the last changeset |
| 05:11:02 | gislars: | if I pass an ogc:filter via url to the wms do I need a "special" configuration on server side? |
| 05:11:14 | gislars: | my filter seems to get ignored |
| 05:11:32 | gislars: | there is also no mention of filter in logfile |
| 05:11:43 | gislars: | ...not sure if there sould be on at level 5 |
| 05:12:48 | assefa: | gislars: ofc:filter is used with wfs ( you mentionned wms )? |
| 05:13:30 | gislars: | yes, shouldn't it also be usable with wms? |
| 05:14:03 | gislars: | so i just get the features renderd where the filter matches |
| 05:14:04 | assefa: | It can be used as part of an SLD |
| 05:15:30 | gislars: | so I would pass an SLD and within that would be the filter? |
| 05:15:40 | assefa: | yes correct |
| 05:16:42 | gislars: | ok, thanks... I'll take a deeper look at the doku... a little confusing this topic right now : ) |
| 05:22:47 | gislars: | does MapServer and Geoserver behave different when ogc:filter are used? |
| 05:24:06 | assefa: | They should not |
| 05:24:37 | gislars: | hmm |
| 05:24:55 | gislars: | in geoserver there are sample request, this is one: |
| 05:24:57 | gislars: | geoserver/wms?request=GetMap&layers=tiger:poly_landmarks,tiger:tiger_roads&styles=,&bbox=-73.97,40.74,-73.93,40.78&Format=image/png&width=344&height=500&srs=EPSG:4326&filter=( %3CFilter%20xmlns=%22http://www.opengis.net/ogc%22%3E%3CPropertyIsEqualTo%3E%3CPropertyName%3ELANAME%3C/PropertyName%3E%3CLiteral%3EEast%20River%3C/Literal%3E%3C/PropertyIsEqualTo%3E%3C/Filter%3E )( %3CFilter%20xmlns=%22http://www.opengis.net/ogc%22%3E%3CProperty |
| 05:24:57 | gislars: | IsEqualTo%3E%3CPropertyName%3ENAME%3C/PropertyName%3E%3CLiteral%3EWest%20Rd%3C/Literal%3E%3C/PropertyIsEqualTo%3E%3C/Filter%3E ) |
| 05:25:35 | gislars: | so here is the filter passed withouth an SLD |
| 05:25:43 | gislars: | looks like so |
| 05:31:39 | assefa: | I did not know that Geoserver supported filter directly with a WMS. the specs do not support filter directly as far as I know. It is a cconvinient way I agree |
| 05:33:26 | gislars: | I don't know the specs in such detail... so that would be a difference between MS and GS? |
| 05:41:17 | assefa: | Yes that is a difference. Could be added in MapServer as an enhancement but was not requested by people as fr as I know. You could add an enhancement bug for it in Mapserver |
| 05:45:13 | aboudreault: | hobu: around? |
| 05:49:10 | CIA-6: | aboudreault * r9608 /trunk/docs/en/mapfile/outputformat.txt: Added a note about AGG rendering with experimental png and transparency using a palette |
| 05:51:08 | CIA-6: | aboudreault * r9609 /branches/branch-5-4/docs/mapfile/outputformat.txt: Added a note about AGG rendering with experimental png and transparency using a palette ( 5.4 doc ) |
| 05:51:47 | aboudreault: | hobu: nvm, was just a sphinx syntax question... I did something else. |
| 07:24:03 | DarcyB_SAR: | aboudreault: looks like I'm getting further.. Thanks for the help, it looks like none of the postgis queries ( except the one layer )are returning results |
| 07:24:26 | DarcyB_SAR: | Now I just need to track that down |
| 07:32:17 | aboudreault: | good. Maybe you can retry the data import with osm2pgsql script. |
| 07:43:05 | DarcyB_SAR: | Yeah, it looks like the geom is WAY off |
| 09:02:05 | CIA-6: | aboudreault * r9610 /trunk/mapserver/ ( mapjoin.c mapserver.h mapstring.c ): Modified msStringSplitComplex to avoid memory freeing crash on windows ( #471 ) |
| 10:07:25 | aboudreault: | assefa__: hola |
| 10:07:35 | aboudreault: | around? |
| 10:07:44 | assefa__: | hi Alan ; ) |
| 10:08:59 | aboudreault: | I'm looking the ticket #2165 , and I see that most of functions can set a error with msSetError, but don't always return immediately. |
| 10:09:27 | aboudreault: | Should I take care of as soon as we set an error, the return value of the function is failure ? |
| 10:16:31 | assefa: | Alan: I think they should return immediat;y after an error |
| 10:17:22 | assefa: | I am not sure though if the calling functions always propagate the error. |
| 10:19:47 | aboudreault: | Hmm.. checking the msSLDParseRasterSymbolizer function, and there are 3 SetError but the function continues, I can modify that to return immediately, hopefully nothing will be affected by that change. |
| 10:22:47 | aboudreault: | assefa: I'm going to modify all funtions to return immediately after a seterror...... I suppose that we can simply rerun the wxs tests to see if everything is ok? |
| 10:25:45 | assefa: | Alan, works. I think though that the error might not be propagated by the calling functions. I can revisit the bug and update it for this issue. |
| 10:26:23 | aboudreault: | All right. thx |
| 12:36:57 | CIA-6: | aboudreault * r9611 /trunk/mapserver/ ( HISTORY.TXT mapogcsld.c mapogcsld.h ): Fixed ogc sld functions to return proper values ( #2165 ) |
| 14:54:02 | DarcyB_SAR: | aboudreault: yes the issue looks like a problem with the source projection of the OSM data not being in the extents where it should be. |