#OSGEO IRC Log - 2007-09-27

For logs after Feb 3, 2007, all times are GMT-8. Prior logs are GMT-9.
Back to Logs
07:18:52 sevenof9: mornin'
07:46:11 acuster: hey all, did anyone writeup notes on the annual meeting at foss4g?
07:47:12 crschmidt: The IRC logs had a bunch of content
07:47:32 gsherman: crschmidt, pay attention
07:47:45 acuster: lol
07:47:50 crschmidt: gsherman: you pay attention. he mentioned my name, did he mention your name?
07:47:58 gsherman: nah, i'm a loser
07:48:16 crschmidt: http://logs.qgis.org/osgeo/%23osgeo.2007-09-24.log
07:48:20 acuster: what day was the meeting?
07:48:21 sigq: Title: IRC Log - #OSGEO ( at logs.qgis.org )
07:48:25 crschmidt: acuster: that's the link
07:48:27 acuster: ah, thanks
07:48:35 crschmidt: gsherman: you're just too old
07:48:39 crschmidt: ; )
07:48:40 gsherman: yup
07:53:17 gsherman: crschmidt, hah!, he said quantum gis
07:53:23 gsherman: did he say openlayers?
07:53:58 crschmidt: he said mapbuilder. mapbuilder is just openlayers + XML
07:56:32 acuster: well that was a waste of a read. Thanks for taking notes though.
08:00:36 sevenof9: The inner works of Open Source Projects
08:00:43 sevenof9: Hobu and Chris
08:01:07 sevenof9: How many people have their first experience of Open Source today?
08:01:11 sevenof9: Half the audience
08:01:13 sevenof9: Woa
08:01:18 sevenof9: How many are developers
08:01:25 sevenof9: >20
08:01:32 sevenof9: As usual, they are off hacking
08:01:42 sevenof9: Title: Who is the project?
08:01:49 sevenof9: Users
08:01:55 sevenof9: Users who write codee
08:02:00 sevenof9: Uers who write dosc
08:02:03 acuster: what's the talk?
08:02:07 sevenof9: Users who write tests
08:02:15 sevenof9: "The inner works of Open Source Projects"
08:02:27 sevenof9: Chris and Hobu
08:02:45 sevenof9: hobu explains how users tie into the process
08:02:53 acuster: oooh, sounds totally mushy---good for early morning before the coffee has worked its full magic
08:03:01 sevenof9: He is lying! He says Users write documentations.
08:03:04 sevenof9: :- )
08:03:09 sevenof9: Scratch itches
08:03:25 sevenof9: common interests scratch common itches
08:03:31 sevenof9: Example: OpenLayers
08:03:59 sevenof9: * Mapbender
08:04:00 sevenof9: * MapBuilder
08:04:00 sevenof9: * MapGuide Open Source
08:04:00 sevenof9: * MapServer
08:04:01 sevenof9: * OpenLayers
08:04:03 sevenof9: Desktop Applications
08:04:05 sevenof9: * GRASS
08:04:07 sevenof9: * OSSIM
08:04:09 sevenof9: * Quantum GIS
08:04:11 sevenof9: * gvSIG
08:04:13 sevenof9: Geospatial Libraries
08:04:15 sevenof9: * FDO
08:04:17 sevenof9: * GDAL/OGR
08:04:19 sevenof9: * GeoTools
08:04:21 sevenof9: Metadata Catalog
08:04:23 sevenof9: * GeoNetwork opensource
08:04:25 sevenof9: hehe, IRC SPam
08:04:27 sevenof9: well, he mentioned all of them...
08:04:31 : * acuster was a user who wrote the biggest docs of an app, part of a well known desktop project
08:04:36 darkblueB|off: y, we did a meetup at in Portland, and there was something pretty noteworthy that came out - people tend to do the things that are fun or compelling, but a lot that is necessary just doesnt happen by iteslf.. Challenge for the new OSS world
08:04:39 sevenof9: Venues for Finding Help
08:04:41 sevenof9: kudus to acuster
08:04:46 acuster: what as projects to scratch itches?
08:04:51 sevenof9: kudos to darkblueB|off
08:04:59 : * sevenof9 is ashamed to flame users on IRC
08:05:09 sevenof9: Explain how to find help through
08:05:12 sevenof9: Miailing
08:05:14 sevenof9: lists
08:05:16 sevenof9: IRC
08:05:20 sevenof9: Bug Tracker
08:05:21 sevenof9: Website
08:05:44 sevenof9: Wiki
08:06:19 sevenof9: Hobu explains BugTracker to a bunch of people who are at a FOSS event for the first time. I am impressed.
08:06:35 HyperJohnGraham: morning all
08:06:39 sevenof9: morning
08:07:01 sevenof9: docs differ,
08:07:07 sevenof9: some are good, some are only comments in the source code
08:07:11 sevenof9: Chris takes over.
08:07:23 sevenof9: Don't piss off the develoers!
08:07:25 sevenof9: !!!!
08:07:29 sevenof9: That is not helpful.
08:07:30 gsherman: amen
08:07:35 HyperJohnGraham: any webcast going to happen today ?
08:07:40 sevenof9: The developers are the only ones who really know.
08:07:49 : * sevenof9 does not knoa
08:07:52 sevenof9: aloa
08:08:10 sevenof9: Mailing a developer directly and requesting for things is a mistake
08:08:20 sevenof9: First impression last a long time!
08:08:38 sevenof9: Chris has an elephant's brain when it comes to ugly user behaviour
08:09:05 sevenof9: If you found somethign that does not work for you: Expore the docs, bug tracker, FAQ.
08:09:11 sevenof9: SEARCH yourself.
08:09:19 sevenof9: Google for it.
08:09:37 sevenof9: Blog posts, mailing lists, and so on - this is all out there in the Web!
08:09:58 sevenof9: q="error name" projectname
08:10:11 sevenof9: Reproduce error,
08:10:19 sevenof9: write down references to dos
08:10:28 sevenof9: concise description
08:10:53 sevenof9: all the to the list ( version, data, other software involved fx broweser )
08:11:06 sevenof9: Be Polite, Be Concise, Be Gracious
08:11:42 sevenof9: When the answer comes:
08:11:51 sevenof9: Listen!
08:12:12 : * sevenof9 thinks this is wasted on this channel. We all know this.
08:12:39 sevenof9: Last time I did not transcribe Chris was sad, so I'll go on.
08:12:46 sevenof9: Make developers happy.
08:12:56 sevenof9: Explore Solutions
08:13:04 sevenof9: if it works, document it.
08:13:11 sevenof9: if not successful, file a bug.
08:13:35 sevenof9: include attempted solutions
08:13:43 sevenof9: check whether it has been filed already
08:13:52 sevenof9: document specific failures
08:14:06 sevenof9: document all relevant setup information, platform, etc.
08:14:18 sevenof9: Chris does core talls
08:14:21 sevenof9: talks
08:14:28 sevenof9: pon patents, on how to Open Source.
08:14:37 sevenof9: on how to REST
08:14:40 sevenof9: Cool.
08:14:52 sevenof9: Source code is pickeld, executable knowledge
08:15:02 sevenof9: Attempt to find the error
08:15:16 sevenof9: Don't be afraid of the Source Code.
08:16:25 sevenof9: A developer's time is a limited resource.
08:16:28 sevenof9: DONT WASTE IT!
08:18:37 sevenof9: Chris is a perfect Übergeek
08:19:03 acuster: what *is* this talk?
08:19:04 sevenof9: he does not want money because he has no time because he is resolving problems for free.
08:19:19 acuster: is the room full of 12 year old newbies?
08:19:33 sevenof9: Hobu explains how to connect the Trust Network and find out who can solve the corresponding question.
08:19:40 sevenof9: acuster: Relax.
08:19:46 sevenof9: Everything is fine.
08:19:51 sevenof9: This is necessary.
08:19:52 acuster: Don't panic?
08:19:55 ominoverde: everything is fine
08:20:03 sevenof9: We Geeks think everybody knows.
08:20:12 sevenof9: Fact is - only geeks know.
08:20:19 ominoverde: :- )
08:20:35 acuster: for some approximation of everything that doesn't include the us, the 'raq, the 'lestine and other things
08:21:15 sevenof9: Q: Why don't you point people to service providers right away?
08:21:27 sevenof9: Chris talks about ESR
08:21:40 sevenof9: and why they are giving this talk.
08:21:41 acuster: guns!
08:22:05 acuster: or maybe that's a different esr
08:22:19 acuster: oh, esri
08:22:25 sevenof9: Q: I was just thinking that the Gift Economy was a place where you could give money just to get answers.
08:22:47 acuster: well you can 'give the money' all you want
08:22:54 sevenof9: Hobu: The expectations of users go through different stages
08:23:10 sevenof9: first they do not understand why a developer works on their problem immediately
08:23:15 sevenof9: then they start to understand
08:23:27 sevenof9: then they go through the steps as described above.
08:24:01 sevenof9: Chris is really pissed off.
08:24:11 sevenof9: But he stills laughs.
08:25:14 rabble: not everybody here knows
08:29:32 sevenof9: Good Talk!
08:33:36 sevenof9: Tim Bowden
08:33:45 crschmidt: thanks, arnulf
08:33:50 sevenof9: how to blow away millions and still make friends.
08:34:05 darkblueB: sevenof9: thank you!
08:34:38 sevenof9: How can GeoFOSS chenage tech solutions to the Business Problem
08:34:50 sevenof9: Freedom toe find the tech that fits the prob
08:34:58 sevenof9: freedom to adapt that piece
08:35:15 sevenof9: freedem to select the base tech without proprietary barrieres
08:35:39 sevenof9: Why 3.5 million?
08:35:52 sevenof9: HOW to blow away 3.5 million?
08:36:00 sevenof9: you need a few proprietary friends
08:36:00 acuster: oh, it arnulf! Salut!
08:36:10 sevenof9: hey acuster :- )
08:36:28 sevenof9: how good was the ( im )propr solution
08:36:41 sevenof9: How the OS soultion compared
08:37:25 sevenof9: The proprietary vendor had a very similar stack to that of the OS solution.
08:37:33 sevenof9: Numbers of installations were siimilar
08:37:43 sevenof9: style was different
08:37:51 sevenof9: the FOSS version solved the problem
08:38:02 sevenof9: the proprietary version maximized installed version
08:38:17 sevenof9: the proprietary style maximized numbers of installed software
08:38:50 bwoodall: sevenof9 rocks
08:39:11 sevenof9: Only where you have an expensive business problem, there is potential for a good solution.
08:39:38 sevenof9: potnetially the cost of the solution is near that of the problem
08:40:16 sevenof9: Ah, OK.
08:40:30 sevenof9: Tim points our difference between cost and value.
08:40:55 sevenof9: cost of solution is 1k, value can be immensly more
08:41:13 sevenof9: intrinsict value of technolog has no intrinsic value whatsoever.
08:41:21 sevenof9: intrinsict value of technolog is nothing
08:41:47 : * sevenof9 is lost in Tim's rhetoric expertise and mixes up bits
08:42:26 sevenof9: proprietary thinking: do not ever give away technology!
08:42:34 sevenof9: why did the proprietary version fail?
08:42:41 sevenof9: several reasons
08:42:52 sevenof9: it was a disconnected architecture
08:42:58 sevenof9: many transactions
08:43:08 sevenof9: they put the database in the middle
08:43:25 sevenof9: and ran into trouble with the transactions
08:43:29 sevenof9: they had the software
08:43:34 sevenof9: they had the tech expertise
08:43:39 sevenof9: they had experience
08:43:48 sevenof9: plenty of business experience
08:44:09 sevenof9: What they did wrong is to select the software by the price sticker on the box
08:44:19 sevenof9: and the technolgoy was the wrong one.
08:45:03 sevenof9: What options does the Proprietary Vendor have?
08:45:10 : * sevenof9 thinks none... :- )
08:45:27 sevenof9: Sell the solution instead of the tech?
08:45:28 sevenof9: Price gets in the way
08:45:38 sevenof9: Why can't hey go open source?
08:45:51 sevenof9: They can't because their business model is on selling boxes.
08:46:04 sevenof9: Why is Open Source so disruptive?
08:46:18 acuster: it's not free software is disruptive
08:46:32 : * sevenof9 doe not think that it is disruptive. That is such a strong word
08:46:48 sevenof9: it is like "software piracy"
08:46:54 acuster: sure it is, you have freedom to help others all of a sudden
08:47:00 acuster: that's pretty powerful
08:47:06 sevenof9: Answer:
08:47:20 sevenof9: Early adopters are ignored by the Bigguns
08:58:27 sevenof9: demonstrate the solution by showing it ( license costs are not the problem )
08:58:31 sevenof9: Look for allies
08:59:03 : * sevenof9 wonders how long she was offline... Network unstable.
09:00:17 sevenof9: solving the problems along the way
09:00:34 sevenof9: Open Source is the Community
09:00:45 sevenof9: without Community Open Source is nothing.
09:01:40 bwoodall: about 10 minutes, sevenof9
09:02:21 sevenof9: He is not stopping. Will have to cut him off now.
09:02:43 acuster: line up the tasers
09:02:46 acuster: charge!
09:10:52 Schuyler: hallo
10:25:24 : * sevenof9 is back online
10:25:51 sevenof9: Gavin Fleming
10:26:26 sevenof9: Chair for FOSS4G 2008 in Capetown. South Africa
10:26:56 sevenof9: Sustainable Development
10:27:14 sevenof9: Quality of Life
10:28:02 sevenof9: Max-Neef classifies the fundamental human needs as:
10:28:03 sevenof9: * subsistence,
10:28:05 sevenof9: * protection,
10:28:07 sevenof9: * affection,
10:28:09 sevenof9: * understanding,
10:28:11 sevenof9: * participation,
10:28:13 sevenof9: * recreation ( in the sense of leisure, time to reflect, or idleness ),
10:28:15 sevenof9: * creation,
10:28:17 sevenof9: * identity and
10:28:19 sevenof9: * freedom.
10:28:21 sevenof9: from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_human_needs
10:28:23 sigq: Title: Fundamental human needs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ( at en.wikipedia.org )
10:28:43 sevenof9: now and into the future
10:28:51 sevenof9: financially sound
10:29:07 sevenof9: Maintain and build resource ( going RESTful... :- )
10:29:10 chippy: spauprcif
10:29:20 sevenof9: human and capital
10:29:45 sevenof9: GIS is good to supporting these things
10:29:52 sevenof9: FOSSGIS is even better
10:29:56 sevenof9: :-' )
10:30:12 sevenof9: Largest Gini coefficient
10:30:18 sevenof9: Huge disparity
10:30:35 sevenof9: included access to electricity, computers, bandwith
10:30:41 sevenof9: 45% unemployment
10:30:42 sevenof9: ouch
10:31:00 sevenof9: all the above applies to SA - not to FOSSGIS
10:31:07 : * sevenof9 just wants to make sure...
10:31:53 sevenof9: GEOSS ( global earht observation system of systems )
10:32:03 sevenof9: 10 yea implementation plan
10:32:15 sevenof9: 9 societal benefit areas
10:32:22 sevenof9: ( look up list yourself )
10:32:47 sevenof9: http://earthobservation.org/
10:32:48 sigq: Title: earthobservation.org ( at earthobservation.org )
10:33:32 sevenof9: Arhgh - don't go there.
10:33:33 sevenof9: Bad!
10:33:38 sevenof9: http://www.earthobservations.org/index.html
10:33:39 sigq: Title: GEO Group on Earth Observations | Home ( at www.earthobservations.org )
10:33:45 sevenof9: missing an "s" at the end.
10:33:48 sevenof9: Grmpf.
10:34:12 sevenof9: GEOSS reqiurements includes Service Oriented Architecture.
10:34:16 sevenof9: Who teels them?
10:34:28 sevenof9: ...tells them about ROA and REST?
10:34:43 sevenof9: interop, open standards
10:34:50 sevenof9: Open Source whereever possible.
10:35:35 sevenof9: A lot is already happening in SA
10:35:59 sevenof9: Government endorsed an Open Source Policy
10:36:10 sevenof9: all gov't software must be Open Source in future.
10:36:12 sevenof9: Cool.
10:37:09 sevenof9: Official aspects are in place
10:37:19 sevenof9: So what is missing?
10:37:30 sevenof9: We are.
10:37:47 sevenof9: Where can FOSS GIS help?
10:38:05 sevenof9: ...set of standard savings list
10:38:22 sevenof9: also increas local skills
10:38:30 sevenof9: building local businesses
10:39:12 sevenof9: provide wider access to information
10:39:25 sevenof9: GIS is now in SA school curriculum
10:39:36 sevenof9: ( this is more than most countries can say! )
10:39:51 sevenof9: BUT they have no electricity
10:40:04 sevenof9: let alone computers or even web access
10:40:19 sevenof9: so get into schools and universities
10:41:25 sevenof9: Gavin challenges "us" to put together an easy to use edu package for next year's conference
10:41:51 sevenof9: GISBox
10:42:19 sevenof9: seems to be a Mac box with MapServer, GRASS, some client
10:43:02 : * sevenof9 didn't quite get it, seems like US$ 3K for a year long subscription to access all SA geo data?!
10:43:37 sevenof9: FOSS GIS in Health, Disaster Management
10:43:54 sevenof9: manage fires in almost real time
10:44:27 sevenof9: Democracy, public participation also critical to sust. dev.
10:44:52 sevenof9: collaboration, sharing, communities, PPGIS, TOPP, 'power to people'
10:45:04 sevenof9: monitoring
10:45:07 sevenof9: swe
10:45:49 sevenof9: FOSS GIS as business
10:46:02 sevenof9: Four that Gavin knows of in SA!
10:46:17 sevenof9: QSens ( with that GISBox ) and Globalimage
10:46:28 sevenof9: Bind local capacity
10:46:34 sevenof9: Mintek incubation project
10:46:42 sevenof9: Whats he doing there?
10:46:54 sevenof9: Setting up stacks with the OSGeo stack
10:47:30 sevenof9: Case study: Xolobeni
10:48:14 sevenof9: mining on the beach
10:48:42 sevenof9: Opportunity: FOSS GIS incubator
10:49:02 sevenof9: focus on building local businesses
10:49:40 : * sevenof9 got to talk to that man. Seems like a good decision to go there with FOSS4G.
10:50:17 sevenof9: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa
10:50:18 sigq: Title: Africa Info Page ( at lists.osgeo.org )
10:53:56 sevenof9: lunch
12:02:46 ominoverde: room is getting crowded, Arita Franklin music on
12:02:48 ominoverde: seven, where are thou?
12:02:59 ominoverde: bitner: any fresh comment?
12:03:12 bitner: when do I get to win the ipod
12:03:36 ominoverde: I've forgot to fill up the form!
12:05:00 bitner: paul trying to get folks to sit down
12:06:10 bitner: flash bulbs going crazy
12:06:23 bitner: talking about south africa foss4g2008
12:06:34 bitner: intro to next years conference
12:06:40 bitner: gavin fleming
12:06:43 crschmidt: well done to paul and his team
12:06:50 crschmidt: this is the conference video
12:06:54 crschmidt: conference center*
12:07:18 crschmidt: ( showing a video of the conferencce center in capetown )
12:07:31 bitner: are the models going to be there?
12:07:39 crschmidt: they better be
12:07:45 ominoverde: suggestive video with italians car
12:07:48 crschmidt: Looks quite cool. Shame it's $2500 to get there :p
12:07:54 crschmidt: Video finishes
12:08:03 crschmidt: he's wearing a mediva shirt
12:08:08 : * bitner is now collecting donations to send him
12:08:10 crschmidt: well done to the other places that put in bids
12:08:15 crschmidt: thanks to osgeo for choosing south africa
12:08:18 crschmidt: 1 year from now
12:08:21 : * sevenof9 is happy that finally crschmidt took over!
12:08:25 bitner: sept 29-oct 3
12:08:34 crschmidt: South africa is a country
12:08:36 crschmidt: bottom of africa
12:08:40 sevenof9: laughter
12:08:44 crschmidt: not quite southernmost tip
12:08:47 crschmidt: southernmost city
12:08:51 crschmidt: southwest corner hook
12:09:05 crschmidt: capetown faces north
12:09:10 sevenof9: Google ketchup
12:09:16 crschmidt: landmark south of it, cape point and lots of interesting things to do
12:09:25 crschmidt: daniel krige invented in 1951
12:09:35 crschmidt: mark shuttleworth, thawte + canonical / ubuntu
12:09:55 crschmidt: other projects around there
12:09:55 sevenof9: pronounce übüntü
12:10:01 crschmidt: john hay, freebsd core
12:10:08 crschmidt: gdal/ossim contributors
12:10:18 crschmidt: lots of open source + gis things going on
12:10:37 bitner: 170 people on local chapter list
12:10:42 crschmidt: Showing lots of pictures
12:10:43 bitner: pretty pics
12:11:04 crschmidt: some ideas of topics
12:11:05 sevenof9: why does he shows us these, we never see any of this anyway... :- )
12:11:19 bitner: wine tasting
12:11:22 bitner: : )
12:11:23 crschmidt: wine is big in south africa
12:11:29 sevenof9: we'll see that
12:11:30 crschmidt: winery tours
12:11:37 crschmidt: snow on the mountains in winter
12:11:49 crschmidt: features: build on FOSS4G stuff
12:12:01 crschmidt: african penguins
12:12:11 crschmidt: more pictures
12:12:15 crschmidt: landmarks, flowers, etc.
12:12:44 crschmidt: outreach to univerities
12:12:51 bitner: tech visits ++
12:12:52 crschmidt: technical visits to other fossgis/proprietary gis is used
12:12:56 bitner: sounds cool
12:13:01 crschmidt: public lectures + workshops -- beyond conference participants.
12:13:23 crschmidt: outreach going through into shabeen tour
12:13:27 crschmidt: informal settlement tour
12:13:37 crschmidt: areas where fossgis can be applied to help solve problems
12:13:47 crschmidt: Outreach in these areas
12:13:56 bitner: virtual market
12:13:58 crschmidt: new features: virtual market where people can put up challenges/oppourtunities
12:14:06 crschmidt: incorporate local gissa conerence
12:14:24 crschmidt: a lot of local south africans
12:14:43 crschmidt: hope to be able to sponsor/support for people from developing countries to get there
12:14:44 bitner: sponsor students from devel coutnries
12:14:48 crschmidt: fair trade, green event guideleines
12:15:05 crschmidt: See a whale in capteown -- killer sharks, killer whales
12:15:15 crschmidt: seals are favorite food for sharks
12:15:36 crschmidt: cradle of humankind
12:16:13 crschmidt: describing lots of things outside south africa
12:16:14 : * sevenof9 will have to stay the rest of year after the conference to visit all those places
12:16:23 crschmidt: travel beyond capetown and see safaris, gamedrives, etc.
12:16:43 crschmidt: why in south africa
12:16:47 crschmidt: national open source software
12:16:55 bitner: gov open source policy ++
12:16:57 crschmidt: interoperable, open standards
12:17:09 crschmidt: full support for president's office.
12:17:30 crschmidt: gis is part of the school curriculum.
12:17:45 crschmidt: excellent it skills
12:17:50 crschmidt: affordable ( half the cost of canada )
12:17:55 crschmidt: ideal solution for developing countrie
12:18:22 crschmidt: not so much of a developer core, hoping to grow communication
12:18:30 crschmidt: long way to travel
12:18:39 crschmidt: more expensive other places to NA than NA -> Africa
12:18:55 bitner: another video
12:19:17 bitner: capetown tourism video
12:19:37 : * bitner is hungry watching these
12:21:16 crschmidt: okay, i'm done for now, going to chat with wife instead of transcribing
12:21:19 crschmidt: someone else can take over
12:21:50 sevenof9: cal +27 blabla
12:22:07 bitner: paul back up
12:22:07 sevenof9: applause
12:22:18 bitner: closing panel moderated by adena
12:22:25 bitner: from directions mag
12:22:43 sevenof9: Adena motions panel to get seated.
12:22:45 bitner: panel: mark sondheim bc land mgmnt
12:22:53 bitner: tim bowden consultant
12:22:57 bitner: frankw
12:23:04 : * sevenof9 is really happy to have Adena here. This is great!
12:23:07 bitner: peter batty leads a startup
12:23:33 bitner: topics
12:23:36 bitner: present
12:23:38 bitner: future
12:23:40 bitner: standards
12:23:48 bitner: os + proprietary vendors
12:23:55 bitner: positioning ourselves
12:24:22 bitner: the present:
12:24:24 sevenof9: Hmm. How does the OS community fit itself into the geo-community?
12:24:39 sevenof9: I thought that I am already in the geo-community?
12:25:01 bitner: tim: on server side we are doing very good "a-"
12:25:07 bitner: documentation lacking
12:25:13 bitner: assumes too much knowledge
12:25:13 sevenof9: Tim Bowden: critical
12:25:18 bitner: not written for noobs
12:25:28 : * sevenof9 heard that one before.
12:25:38 bitner: desktop -- not doing nearly as well "c-"
12:25:50 bitner: tools have capabilities... but
12:26:01 bitner: same probs as wider os community
12:26:10 bitner: focus too much on tools, not how they are being used
12:26:17 bitner: need usability programs
12:26:36 bitner: take a hint from the gaming community
12:27:11 bitner: we focus on power of the tools, not about workflow, functionality
12:27:11 sevenof9: ( ( those stools look semi-comfortable. :- ) )
12:27:36 sevenof9: geeks / users
12:27:48 bitner: frankw:
12:27:56 bitner: we operate at disadvantage
12:28:11 bitner: financial investment makes people feel they have to like it
12:28:25 bitner: ( proprietary software )
12:28:30 sevenof9: no pre-commitment in Open Source
12:28:57 bitner: is that peter or mark?
12:29:44 bitner: migration from smallworld difficult
12:30:02 bitner: peter:
12:30:10 bitner: impressed with energy e3xcitement
12:30:21 bitner: in our early days still
12:30:25 bitner: canada furthest ahead
12:30:47 bitner: a lot of traction here
12:30:57 bitner: more work to educate broader community
12:31:13 bitner: people not aware what's going on here
12:31:26 bitner: consolidate initiative
12:31:28 bitner: s
12:31:44 sevenof9: admits that is not easy to do
12:31:52 bitner: tim disagrees
12:32:06 bitner: believes the best will rise to the surface
12:32:12 bitner: don't need consolidation
12:32:58 sevenof9: top down or buttom up discussion
12:33:07 bitner: now questions to audience
12:33:10 sevenof9: Adena stops the discussion and asks plenary
12:33:36 ominoverde: 360* room overview: http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1212/1449572034_26024a972f_b.jpg
12:33:55 sevenof9: Lots of Open Source is money driven
12:34:01 sevenof9: ( that is a question )
12:34:05 sevenof9: ?
12:34:14 ominoverde: ??
12:34:24 sevenof9: within software packages it might be important to make functions converge?
12:34:27 sevenof9: Hu?
12:34:31 ominoverde: actually sevenof9, which is the question?
12:34:34 : * bitner not following
12:34:39 bitner: modularization?
12:34:42 : * ominoverde neither
12:34:42 sevenof9: Modularizing is good?
12:34:52 sevenof9: Q: ( tries again )
12:34:58 : * ominoverde will modularize then
12:35:05 sevenof9: there is companies who want functions in software
12:35:19 sevenof9: and and coherent piece of software
12:35:25 sevenof9: FrankW agrees
12:35:29 : * sevenof9 is releived
12:35:30 bitner: streamline features into singel software that cooperates within itself
12:35:31 bitner: frankw:
12:35:42 bitner: oss driven by customer needs
12:36:00 bitner: immediate response, but doesn't ensure everything goes along togetyher
12:36:06 sevenof9: coordianted by PSC
12:36:22 bitner: governance model can help
12:36:34 bitner: tim: comes back to usability testing
12:36:40 bitner: make sure everything fits together
12:36:44 ominoverde: is frankW using a french accent?
12:36:59 sevenof9: Venka
12:37:14 sevenof9: qGis and GRASS coming together
12:37:23 sevenof9: gvSIG and GeoTools( ? )
12:37:39 sevenof9: so by FOSS4G 2008 we will have more cooperation
12:37:40 : * nhv not so sure likes many ways of doing things approach more experimentation assures 'genetic' health
12:37:43 bitner: tim buts in with pessimism again
12:37:46 sevenof9: Tim is less optimistic
12:37:59 sevenof9: Tim is after usability
12:38:09 bitner: is there web cast up now?
12:38:17 sevenof9: nhv++
12:38:21 nhv: I lost the url
12:38:29 bitner: ubuntu is making headway
12:38:39 bitner: we need to learn lessons from them
12:38:44 : * sevenof9 wonders how one can lose a URL?
12:38:58 sevenof9: takes a lot of money
12:39:05 sevenof9: its a business problem
12:39:05 bitner: move on to future question
12:39:06 nhv: left it on another machine
12:39:12 bitner: starting with frankw
12:39:19 sevenof9: Adena shoots at Frank. Don't do that. We still need him,
12:39:21 bitner: will we see foss4g be dominated by few
12:39:32 bitner: companies, projects
12:39:43 sevenof9: how can OS be more successfull
12:39:43 sevenof9: it is already
12:39:44 sevenof9: :- )
12:39:48 nhv: it started that way
12:39:57 sevenof9: IBM. Novell, blabla
12:40:04 sevenof9: but they do not have a lot of control
12:40:04 nhv: but we are seeing more projects come forward
12:40:11 bitner: don't have a lot of control even though they have a lot of presence
12:40:17 sevenof9: ends up in the community
12:40:31 bitner: will see the same thing with foss4g
12:40:35 bitner: never locked in
12:40:37 sevenof9: essentially community is simply to vast to control or "manage". Which is a good thing.
12:40:41 bitner: they don't own their user base
12:40:57 sevenof9: will see consolidation
12:41:07 bitner: will see some consolidatioin around products that get a lot of interets
12:41:19 bitner: mapserver has traditionally had large mindshare
12:41:28 bitner: now openlayers doing the same with slippy maps
12:41:28 sevenof9: OpenLayers is huge on that issus
12:41:39 sevenof9: leaving other guys behind
12:41:42 sevenof9: laughs
12:41:50 sevenof9: lotsalols
12:41:53 crschmidt: 2whoo, openlayers
12:42:16 sevenof9: crschmidt: ++
12:42:45 bitner: peter: quote buying proprietary software llike buying car with hood welded shurt
12:42:48 sevenof9: web mapping will drive a lot of momentum
12:42:51 nhv: openlayers is cool but is only presentation layer
12:42:51 sevenof9: in the OS arean
12:42:53 sevenof9: arena
12:42:58 sevenof9: PostGIS is another one
12:43:38 bitner: difficult when want to standardize on one db across enterprise
12:43:46 sevenof9: nhv: it is what people see. This will be our problem to cope with more and more in future. I dunno how Frank copes with it.
12:43:52 sevenof9: Nobody "sees" GDAL
12:44:00 bitner: prediction more closed source vendors will want to get involved in oss
12:44:09 sevenof9: hard sell on gov't
12:44:23 bitner: mark: hard sell in gov -- but canada has managed to play a sig role
12:44:30 nhv: gov't is is getting behind OS
12:44:46 bitner: jts geos, funded by bc gov
12:44:52 bitner: & ontario
12:45:01 sevenof9: benefits of Open Source seen globally
12:45:16 sevenof9: ESRI owns ontario
12:45:18 sevenof9: ouch
12:45:22 bitner: "esri pretty much owns ontario"
12:45:25 bitner: hee hee
12:45:47 bitner: bc emergency services using postgis
12:45:52 sevenof9: ...swiching to geo data
12:46:16 sevenof9: wandering over to "enterprise solution" not making exclusive use of Open Source
12:46:26 sevenof9: Why that?
12:46:26 sevenof9: :- )
12:46:47 bitner: tim: when talking about enterprise solutions we're missing the mark
12:46:57 bitner: postgresql is the general it solution
12:47:05 bitner: postgis is just a part of it
12:47:12 bitner: can/should be used throughout
12:47:20 sevenof9: PostgreSQL / PostGIS is in enterprise use!
12:47:23 nhv: bitner ++
12:47:31 sevenof9: Tim ++
12:47:33 bitner: gis will get subsumed as part of normal ops
12:47:45 : * bitner just transcribing
12:48:02 : * nhv thanks the scribes
12:48:10 : * sevenof9 sometimes tweaks content slightly. Sorry for that.
12:48:21 nhv: commentary appreciated
12:48:59 bitner: peter: if you're selling postgis, they will be replacing db with postgresql for other uses too
12:49:08 bitner: back to audience
12:49:31 bitner: growth rate?
12:49:45 bitner: two person shop with one programmer, should jump in now or wait
12:49:56 bitner: faster to devel as apps mature
12:50:02 bitner: tim:
12:50:11 bitner: we've already got most of the tools to solve the problems
12:50:22 bitner: peter: os more mature on db side, less on client
12:50:29 : * bitner disagrees on web mapping side
12:50:44 bitner: frankw: don't wait
12:50:51 bitner: another Q
12:51:07 bitner: rise of app dev communities like the arcview community
12:51:17 bitner: ( presumably like the avenue community )
12:51:30 bitner: now we have the python community ( frankw )
12:51:37 bitner: people have doing that on grass forever
12:51:46 bitner: web environment
12:51:58 bitner: don't have to be a rocket scientist
12:52:16 bitner: sometimes general python community, not necesarily just geo comm
12:52:22 ticheler: we should put an OSGeoScripts sectin up!
12:52:28 ticheler: section
12:52:31 bitner: ticheler: ++
12:52:44 bitner: tim: franks right ( laughter )
12:52:52 bitner: don't think about gis, it's dead
12:52:58 bitner: it's now part of everything else
12:53:22 bitner: it's happening, it's just not all the same and as obvious
12:53:36 bitner: peter: asset mgmt etc now has spatial parts
12:54:27 darkblueB|off: geospatially enabled data is grwoing much, much faster than the core of GIS trained pros can handle
12:54:52 bitner: mark: reality, specific geo groups not quite as important
12:54:58 sevenof9: test 234
12:54:59 bitner: find people who understand the tools
12:55:01 : * sevenof9 is being censored by the network
12:55:24 bitner: on to 3rd topic, standards
12:55:34 bitner: what should the relation be between ogc and osgeo
12:55:47 bitner: defacto open standards, let people catch up?
12:55:50 bitner: mark:
12:55:57 sevenof9: GIS is dead
12:56:06 bitner: what kind of standards?
12:56:11 bitner: model, distro,...
12:56:32 bitner: SFS model most succesful thing out of ogc
12:56:36 bitner: WMS a second
12:56:50 sevenof9: OGC cool! Applause by Raj
12:57:04 bitner: gml3 harder take
12:57:12 sevenof9: Tim is being negative again. :- )
12:57:57 sevenof9: Some standards are to highly sophisticated
12:57:57 bitner: previous standard tehy tried to use was too complicated, worked for them, but noone else usesd
12:58:00 sevenof9: too
12:58:11 bitner: SAIF was format
12:58:21 bitner: that's where safe software's name came from
12:58:28 bitner: ( side note from adena )
12:58:48 sevenof9: "...the extinct GIS community..."
12:59:13 bitner: "it" was known for sfs
12:59:27 bitner: not for all other standards
12:59:32 bitner: "it" being the goal
12:59:40 sevenof9: now "it" is simply "information technology"
12:59:44 sevenof9: :- )
13:00:10 sevenof9: What relationship should OSGeo have with OGC
13:00:14 bitner: OGC still has some life in it
13:00:20 sevenof9: OSGeo should have a strong rel
13:00:20 bitner: we should have strong relationship
13:00:32 bitner: are there other bodies out there arch, engineering, utils
13:00:37 bitner: that we should have rels with too
13:00:49 bitner: cautiously...
13:00:57 : * sevenof9 comments that OSGeo should help OGC survive Google
13:01:04 bitner: Tim: we should have strong relationship, but we shouldn't wait for them
13:01:13 bitner: we are fast by nature, they are slow and cautious
13:01:24 bitner: we should explore what should be done then hand that to the OGC
13:01:30 sevenof9: well, we are not that fast
13:01:46 : * bitner looks to crschmidt
13:01:47 darkblueB: experimental perhaps
13:02:12 sevenof9: crschmidt is an Übergeek
13:02:16 crschmidt: hey, I said that, I though
13:02:17 crschmidt: t
13:02:20 bitner: frankw: georss a good example
13:02:22 crschmidt: didn't i?
13:03:06 bitner: ogc chould be the stnadards body osgeo should help influence and implement
13:03:08 sevenof9: OGC is standard body, OSGeo should implement the software and give input
13:03:25 : * darkblueB OSGeo has to make sure to have reliable monetization
13:03:43 : * bitner needs a filter that corrects my irc spelling on the fly
13:03:47 : * darkblueB of some kinds, without compromisin itself
13:03:47 sevenof9: darkblueB =~ bigblue?
13:04:24 bitner: we've solved problem of sharing geospatil data
13:04:27 : * darkblueB OSS can exist in a vacuum apart from market, but needs 'visible means of support'
13:04:29 bitner: ( peter )
13:04:58 sevenof9: I don't want to exist in a vacuum. That is painful.
13:05:07 bitner: back to audience
13:05:24 bitner: standards are an opportunity to sell ourself
13:05:30 sevenof9: Standards are an opportunity to move away from prop soft
13:05:33 bitner: as we are often first to meet the standards
13:05:54 bitner: standards give us the edge
13:05:58 bitner: peter disagrees
13:05:59 nhv: georss is a good example of how os community can help ogc
13:06:04 sevenof9: That was not a questions, that was a comment. ( that guy is 4 sure being paid by OGC )
13:06:39 bitner: he's an army corp consultant -- in his experience it *is* likely important
13:07:01 sevenof9: OK. Now the data guys are creeping out of their rspecitve holes.
13:07:29 bitner: science guy now saying we need to look at science community standards too
13:07:35 nhv: if standards don't work osgeo can adopt/make adhoc methods and the standards folk can adopt them
13:07:56 bitner: geonetwork good starting point for metadata work
13:08:00 nhv: science has it's own standards and is just coming to grips with OGC
13:08:36 bitner: next Q
13:08:38 : * sevenof9 is being disrespectful
13:08:45 ticheler: ++ to FrankW
13:08:46 bitner: rel between os and proprietary vendors
13:08:53 sevenof9: What is the challenge of Open Source
13:08:55 sevenof9: ?
13:09:09 bitner: do goog/ms entry into the arena help or hurt
13:09:10 sevenof9: how can Güügle and macrohard
13:09:14 sevenof9: hurt FOSS
13:09:21 bitner: *or help
13:09:25 sevenof9: They can't
13:09:30 bitner: ;- )
13:09:35 sevenof9: can they?
13:09:49 : * bitner trying to transcribe with minimal commentary : )
13:09:54 : * darkblueB impressed by u-umlaut in fast irc
13:10:07 : * nhv thinks we need to be real careful of OpenAPIs that aren't OpenSource
13:10:12 bitner: peter: autodesk saw the writing on the wall
13:10:15 : * sevenof9 has a German keypoard.How does it come through?
13:10:25 ticheler: ok
13:10:25 crschmidt: sevenof9: you're not using utf-8
13:10:27 darkblueB: ü
13:10:34 crschmidt: so it works for people in latin-1
13:10:35 : * sevenof9 can't type nor spell though
13:10:38 crschmidt: ( but not for people who do things right :p )
13:11:31 : * sevenof9 tries to be an Übergeek too. Better?
13:11:41 nhv: that worked
13:11:42 bitner: proprietary vendors moving more towards services and maintenance --- more like the os world
13:12:18 sevenof9: Yes. They also learn. But they still have the inferior business model. :- )
13:12:26 darkblueB: conventiaonal wording is that big corp players 'legitimize' market, what that really means is a lrger topic.. OSS has to be kept honest, too.. Big Players are a great development, until they dominate.. thats another story
13:12:30 : * nhv predicts services and maintenance is where the future money will be
13:12:31 sevenof9: Ignore ESRI
13:12:36 sevenof9: What is ESRI?
13:12:48 sevenof9: how to ignore 15k people?
13:12:58 sevenof9: get them to FOSS4G
13:13:00 sevenof9: :- )
13:13:09 bitner: Tim: move GIS as part of everything
13:13:16 bitner: GIS by itself is dead
13:13:21 sevenof9: nhv: ++
13:13:25 darkblueB: ++
13:13:29 sevenof9: nhv + it already is to some
13:13:34 sevenof9: :- )
13:13:44 nhv: right lat lon are just 2 more columns in the table
13:14:38 bitner: mark: what's impace of all the hiring that google is doing in this field
13:14:46 bitner: tim: profound impact
13:15:03 bitner: investment in making geospatial part of everyday experience
13:15:17 : * ominoverde has low batteries now. Hi jsanz :- )
13:15:20 bitner: ticheler/ominoverde is having borg mind meld, becoming one
13:15:29 sevenof9: Google is only screen scraping 1% of all geospatial data!
13:15:32 jsanz: hi ominoverde
13:15:32 ominoverde: hehe ( echo hehe )
13:15:47 : * darkblueB this google making geo part of search is a big point
13:15:48 ominoverde: hi jorge
13:15:51 : * nhv 's largest fear is that Google will hire away the best of the communities talent
13:16:07 : * ominoverde and ticheler are switching of... batteries other ( in general )
13:16:10 sevenof9: nhv: no problem.
13:16:11 ominoverde: s/other/over/
13:16:17 bitner: nhv: the point was they are pulling the best minds from other fields and making them into geo folks
13:16:18 sevenof9: Either way.
13:16:23 bitner: or at least geo aware
13:16:30 sevenof9: either G hirs people and they work from within
13:16:48 sevenof9: or G cannot hire them because there are others who can proivde a nicer environment.
13:17:15 bitner: spatial is just becoming a part of everything else
13:17:32 : * darkblueB notices many computer geeks work too much, whereever they are
13:17:32 bitner: audience again
13:17:54 : * darkblueB myself included
13:18:28 : * sevenof9 was just awarded a budget of 15k to VisCom for marketing for the next year. We are going to run over the world with that. :- )
13:18:57 sevenof9: Comment was that the props have market and mind share.
13:19:07 bitner: sevenof9: ++
13:20:04 sevenof9: Forest guy asks whether assisted or self controlled is better
13:20:09 bitner: tim: data gains more value when you can free up distribution
13:20:19 sevenof9: Tim comments that data is a difficult thing though
13:20:25 bitner: thanks sevenof9, my fingers are slowing down
13:20:48 darkblueB: !! data is more complex than that one liner
13:21:29 sevenof9: you mean this: ...Google is only screen scraping 1% of all geospatial data!
13:21:40 sevenof9: applause
13:21:40 bitner: panel done
13:21:52 darkblueB: thanks, scribes
13:21:53 sevenof9: Paul takes over
13:22:00 bitner: sol katz award
13:22:16 bitner: frankw and jeff mckenna to the stage
13:22:32 sevenof9: FrankW OSGeo President and Jeffe McKenna present the Sol Katz award.
13:23:51 bitner: background of Sol
13:24:02 bitner: 2005 awarded to Frank W
13:24:11 bitner: 2006 to Markus Neteler
13:24:17 bitner: on to Frank to announce
13:24:23 sevenof9: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Sol_Katz_Award
13:24:25 sigq: Title: Sol Katz Award - OSGEO ( at wiki.osgeo.org )
13:24:27 bitner: Steve Lime
13:24:31 bitner: applause
13:24:34 nhv: w00t!!
13:24:42 bitner: good thing he made it here
13:25:24 bitner: MapServer has been the killer app for osgeo community
13:25:46 bitner: first MUM was the progenitor of our meeting today
13:25:59 bitner: what makes Steve special
13:26:02 sevenof9: FrankW has difficulties reading his scribbles
13:26:04 bitner: strong programmer
13:26:09 bitner: strong technically
13:26:14 bitner: approachable
13:26:16 bitner: egoless
13:26:26 bitner: thrilled to have people take over parts
13:26:29 bitner: not a control freak
13:26:42 bitner: magic not os or tech, way he made welcoming community
13:26:48 bitner: brought together contributors
13:26:59 bitner: MapServer also approachable
13:27:05 bitner: comments from Steve now:
13:27:17 bitner: this is cool, thank you
13:27:31 bitner: admires talent in audience
13:27:34 sevenof9: humble yet again