| 04:32:43 | sigq: | osgeofeed: Changeset [1091]: -- <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/1091> |
| 05:43:20 | Pierre: | tbonfort, ping? |
| 05:44:32 | tbonfort: | Pierre: ack |
| 05:44:40 | Pierre: | tbonfort, hello! |
| 05:44:47 | tbonfort: | hi! |
| 05:45:22 | Pierre: | tbonfort, the "wrong" bug you were refering to from the autocad devs, was it about blending mode and premultiplied alpha? |
| 05:45:34 | tbonfort: | yes |
| 05:46:02 | Pierre: | I thought it was working by default with normal alpha and supports both formats pretty well, no? |
| 05:46:33 | tbonfort: | normal alpha isn't very well supported when blending pixmaps |
| 05:46:53 | tbonfort: | you have to use a premultiplied format when using those |
| 05:47:04 | Pierre: | hm, should be fixed then |
| 05:47:21 | Pierre: | pre multiplied is not always a good thing |
| 05:47:41 | Pierre: | do you have some test cases somewhere? |
| 05:48:02 | tbonfort: | why isn't it a good thing ? |
| 05:49:12 | Pierre: | there is systems working with non multiplied alpha only |
| 05:50:01 | tbonfort: | what test cases are you thinking of ? |
| 05:50:12 | Pierre: | "normal alpha isn't very well supported when blending pixmaps" |
| 05:50:26 | Pierre: | what does not work well with normal alpha |
| 05:50:31 | Pierre: | I can test all ops though : ) |
| 05:52:31 | Pierre: | about the needs of non premultiplied alpha, gd also needs lossless storage for rgba |
| 05:54:01 | tbonfort: | the blend_from function expects premultiplied pixels... I found it simpler to always use a premultiplied renderer to avoid having to switch to/from premultiplied |
| 05:58:20 | Pierre: | it is simpler, but lossy too |
| 05:58:31 | Pierre: | it can be faster too |
| 07:43:19 | sigq: | osgeofeed: Ticket #185 ( task closed ): Incubation Application: DEEGREE <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/185#comment:1> |
| 09:52:01 | racicot: | Schuyler: way cool with the dp.py contribution... I will definitely find a use for that. you da man |
| 10:02:42 | Schuyler: | glad to be of service |
| 10:04:32 | FrankW: | jasonbirch: what project is in incubation, but not on the public osgeo page? |
| 10:05:55 | jasonbirch: | FrankW; other way around. MapServer is in incubation, but does not link back to OSGeo. |
| 10:06:31 | FrankW: | ah, kind of ironic! |
| 10:06:44 | jasonbirch: | : ) |
| 10:06:51 | FrankW: | I'll look into that now. |
| 12:37:39 | sigq: | osgeofeed: Ticket #253 ( task created ): Create download.osgeo.org login for Kenneth Skovhede <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/253> |
| 13:03:17 | sigq: | osgeofeed: Ticket #253 ( task closed ): Create download.osgeo.org login for Kenneth Skovhede <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/253#comment:2> |
| 13:31:11 | ticheler: | Hi jasonbirch |
| 13:31:57 | jasonbirch: | hi ticheler |
| 13:31:57 | ticheler: | do all changes to the official page pass through webcom? Even small changes? |
| 13:32:07 | jasonbirch: | Yes and no. |
| 13:32:09 | ticheler: | Or do you reach agreement on IRC too |
| 13:32:21 | jasonbirch: | Not much activity recently. |
| 13:32:38 | jasonbirch: | We have delegated traslations to individual translators |
| 13:32:47 | jasonbirch: | And the project pages would be delegated too. |
| 13:33:00 | ticheler: | OK |
| 13:33:12 | jasonbirch: | In this case, it had been a while since a meeting, and I think Frank wanted to confirm the changes before going ahead. |
| 13:33:29 | jasonbirch: | In general, I'd prefer to run the committee fairly loosely because structure takes energy. |
| 13:34:14 | ticheler: | But the *'s to emphasize projects in incubation seem just new right? |
| 13:34:52 | : | * ticheler didn't notice them earlier on at least |
| 13:35:10 | ticheler: | and now I see they are on the agenda to be removed again!? |
| 13:40:14 | FrankW: | I think folks taking the initiative and making changes is generally fine. |
| 13:40:24 | FrankW: | But I hesitate to undo them again without some discussion. |
| 13:40:49 | ticheler: | hence you adding it to the agenda? |
| 13:43:34 | FrankW: | right |
| 13:44:05 | FrankW: | The "*" for projects in incubation is actually growing on me now, and I certainly wouldn't mind leaving it. |
| 13:44:19 | ticheler: | :- ) |
| 13:45:01 | FrankW: | BTW, how strongly do you feel about having the "opensource" modifier on the GeoNetwork name on the main page? |
| 13:45:15 | FrankW: | It drags the item out to two lines which I find irritating. |
| 13:45:17 | ticheler: | NP to remove it from there |
| 13:45:22 | FrankW: | Cool! |
| 13:45:46 | ticheler: | it's al over the place on the other pages anyway :- ) |
| 13:45:47 | FrankW: | The mapguide folks are a bit more concerned because they need to differentiate between the OS and Enterprise versions. |
| 13:46:15 | ticheler: | Oh well, we're a bit far from that yet :- ) |
| 13:47:57 | crschmidt: | Why would you want to have 'open' in your project name anyway? |
| 13:47:59 | crschmidt: | I mean, really. |
| 13:48:01 | crschmidt: | oh wait... |
| 13:48:08 | FrankW: | :- ) |
| 13:49:50 | ticheler: | crschmidt: its because we wanted to make sure no one started some row over a registered name we are not aware of |
| 13:51:09 | ticheler: | How's the Layers project going by the way ;- ) |
| 13:51:17 | crschmidt: | ticheler: yes, there was a joke there : ) |
| 13:51:36 | : | * ticheler was late... |
| 17:23:55 | deb_user: | can anybody recommend a tool for coordinate system and datum transformations? |
| 17:24:42 | crschmidt: | proj? |
| 17:25:00 | : | * crschmidt feels like he's answered this question before, and found out his answer was wrong already. |
| 17:25:37 | jgarnett: | proj is fun |
| 17:25:50 | jgarnett: | if you are a Java programmer the geotools project is fun |
| 17:26:15 | jgarnett: | if you are a user uDig can quickly transform your shapefiles etc... |
| 17:26:30 | jgarnett: | I think proj and gdal can do that on the command line... |
| 17:27:40 | spruceboy: | proj will do transformations from one projection to another |
| 17:28:09 | spruceboy: | cs2cs does this, in addition to datum transformations |
| 17:56:57 | sigq: | osgeofeed: Ticket #241 ( defect closed ): QGIS SVN commit account unsubscribed from the list <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/241#comment:3> |
| 20:08:10 | SprocketKing: | Im working on a GIS project myself ... Are there any methods in qt to specify scale levels at which features should not be drawn? |